The system prompt only said "you can propose creating a recipe with
the tool" as a soft option — models were defaulting to just writing
the recipe out as prose in the reply instead of invoking the tool,
since that's the easier default behavior for a "write me a recipe"
request. Rewrote the instruction as a hard rule: full recipes must
go through createRecipe, plain-text ingredient lists/numbered steps
are disallowed in the reply for that case.
v0.46.1
Second tool alongside createRecipe, same safety shape: addToShoppingList's
execute only validates/echoes input, no DB write. The proposal card lets
the user pick an existing list (fetched lazily) or name a new one, then
confirms through the exact two-call flow AddToShoppingListButton already
uses — POST /api/v1/shopping-lists (if new) then POST .../items — no new
persistence code path.
generateMealPlan intentionally not built as a tool: the existing
/api/v1/ai/meal-plan/generate endpoint generates and writes in one step
with a week/preferences input, not a specific plan payload, so it has no
"save this exact draft" entry point to confirm against without a larger
refactor. Documented as a known gap rather than forcing a weaker pattern.
v0.46.0
Gives the general chat a createRecipe tool (Vercel AI SDK, stepCountIs(3))
scoped so it can only ever produce a draft — the tool's execute is a pure
echo, no DB write. The route surfaces the tool call as proposedRecipe
alongside the normal text answer; the chat UI renders it as a card with
explicit Create/Discard buttons. Create POSTs to the existing
/api/v1/recipes endpoint — the same code path and tier/recipe-count limit
the manual editor already goes through — so there's exactly one place
that actually creates a recipe row, and nothing happens without the user
clicking Create.
Scoped to the general assistant only (not per-recipe chat), and to one
tool for now — addToShoppingList/generateMealPlan are follow-ups.
v0.45.0
Widens the tier enum from free/pro to free/pro/team and every
"free" | "pro" cast that assumed exactly two tiers (~30 call sites:
every AI route's withAiQuota/checkAndIncrementTierLimit call, admin
user/invite management, upload quota checks, OpenAPI schemas). Team
sits above Pro with genuinely unlimited recipes/public-recipes (the
-1 sentinel, which Pro doesn't actually use — Pro uses large finite
numbers instead) and a higher AI-call/storage cap. Seeded via
db:seed, editable afterward from Admin > Tiers.
role (user/moderator/admin — permissions) and tier (free/pro/team —
billing limits) stay separate concepts, as they already were; this
does not touch role-based permissions.
Requires migration 0043 to run against a live DB — not applied in
this sandbox (no Docker here); run `pnpm db:migrate` then `pnpm db:seed`.
v0.44.0
The general assistant had exactly one conversation per user forever
(recipeId null on chat_messages) — no way to start fresh or organize
by topic. Adds an ai_conversations table (title, timestamps) and a
nullable conversationId FK on chat_messages; the assistant panel gets
a conversations menu to create/switch/rename/delete, auto-titling a
new conversation from its first question.
Per-recipe chat is untouched — each recipe already has one natural
thread, so multi-conversation support only applies to the homepage
assistant. Pre-existing general messages (no conversationId) aren't
migrated into the new model and won't appear in the conversation list.
Requires migration 0042 to run against a live DB — not applied in
this sandbox (no Docker here); run `pnpm db:migrate`.
v0.43.0
Full list of the audit's confirmed findings and their fixes:
- Stored XSS via unescaped JSON-LD on the public recipe page
(app/r/[id]/page.tsx) — escape < before injecting.
- CSP allowed unsafe-eval in production — now dev-only (Next prod
never eval()s; only its HMR does).
- avatarUrl accepted any URL with no ownership check — now takes an
avatarKey issued by avatar-presign, validated server-side, same
pattern as recipe/review photos.
- No session revocation on password change/reset — both now revoke
other sessions (revokeOtherSessions: true, revokeSessionsOnPasswordReset).
- Rate-limit bypass via spoofable X-Forwarded-For — take the last
(proxy-appended) hop instead of the first (client-supplied) one,
matching the single-Traefik-hop topology.
- Webhook signing secrets stored plaintext — now AES-256-GCM
encrypted like every other secret in this app, with a legacy-
plaintext fallback for pre-existing rows (bare hex has no ":", our
ciphertext format always does).
- Better Auth's own rate limiter defaulted to in-memory storage,
ineffective across replicas — now backed by the same Redis as
lib/rate-limit.ts (secondaryStorage), with storeSessionInDatabase
explicit so session storage itself doesn't move as a side effect.
- Presigned upload URLs didn't bind the declared file size to the
actual upload, letting a client under-declare size (and quota
charge) then PUT an arbitrarily large object — switched to S3
presigned POST with a signed content-length-range condition,
enforced by the storage server itself.
- generateMetadata() on the recipe page skipped the visibility
filter the page body uses, leaking a private recipe's title via
<title> to any signed-in user with the id.
- Block/unblock had no rate limit, unlike follow/unfollow.
- AI quota was charged even when a user's own BYOK key was used
(their own credentials/billing) — added an isByok flag through
the config-resolution chain and skip the charge when set. Also
wired BYOK into generate/generate-from-idea/translate/import-url,
which never looked it up at all before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Convert requireSession -> requireSessionOrApiKey across recipes,
collections, meal-plans, shopping-lists, pantry, feed, and ai/*
(52 routes) so API keys work end-to-end, not just for the handful of
endpoints that supported them before. Scope was explicitly confirmed
per-resource-family with the user before any file was touched.
Left session-cookie-only, deliberately: users/me*, ai-keys/*,
webhooks/*, conversations/*, notifications/*, push/subscribe, admin/*
— account/credential-adjacent surface that shouldn't widen without a
separate, explicit decision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Both chat panels (per-recipe and the general cooking assistant) previously
kept messages in component state only — closing the sheet or reloading
the page lost everything. Both POST routes now persist question+answer
pairs to a new chat_messages table (recipeId null for the general
assistant), and both panels load their own history back on open.
New GET /api/v1/ai/chat-history (scoped by recipeId, or scope=general for
the homepage assistant, or neither to search across everything) backs a
new search control in both panels' header — debounced, shows matched
messages with date and (when searching across everything) which recipe
they belonged to.
Verified locally: asked a real question, closed and reopened the panel
and confirmed the conversation reloaded, then searched a keyword from
that conversation and confirmed both the question and answer surfaced
in the results dropdown.
Moved the homepage cooking-assistant button from bottom-24 to bottom-16 —
still clears the recipe list's floating bulk-action bar, just not as far.
Both chat system prompts (cooking-chat and the per-recipe chat) now
explicitly identify as "Epicure" and are told never to name the underlying
model/provider if asked — previously they'd just answer honestly with
whatever the model calls itself.
Verified locally: screenshotted the new button position, and asked "what
model or AI are you" through the real UI — response identified as Epicure
with no model name.
The existing recipe chat (RecipeChatPanel) is tightly scoped to one
recipe — recipeId is required and its system prompt embeds that recipe's
full ingredient/step context. Added a sibling, not a modification: a new
floating assistant on the recipes list page for questions that aren't
about any specific recipe (technique, substitutions, timing, food safety).
New /api/v1/ai/cooking-chat route (same quota/rate-limit/model-resolution
pattern as recipe-chat, minus the recipe lookup) and CookingAssistantPanel
component (same floating-button + Sheet UI). Positioned at bottom-24
rather than bottom-6 so it doesn't sit in the same band as the recipe
list's floating bulk-action bar during select mode.
Verified locally: asked a real cooking question through the actual UI,
got a correctly-formatted markdown answer with no recipe context leaking
in (confirmed the request payload only carries the question, no recipeId).
Arnaud